Comments on: Ossetia | Why Russia invaded

By: Nieszkaa

Nieszkaa — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:18:43 +0000

that line u got about “Russia does not care about human rights” it sounds like something my mum said once happened in Russia there was a mine and the miners went on strike demanding more pay and better work conditions. instead of listening to the workers the mine was flooded and the problem literally washed away.

however, me personally, have never met a mean russian person they’re really nice. sort of like the “arrogant French” i found are a lot less arrogant than the brits.

so it’s just the government, and not the ppl overall.

By: larisa

larisa — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:48:36 +0000

It seems like Russia is agressor and The USA and others coutries whiter and nice without any bad history.Lets make it clear.Russia is the biggest country it the world who has oil,gas and entire table of chemical elements,including gold and dimonds.Russia was the USSR like everubody remembers.So USSR was agressor,but if u remember this right let u remind who gave u a freedom from fascist invasions,who won the second world war?then why u close yours eyes on events in ukraine or Estonia when they reanimate fascism in their countries?What about Georgia then u should just go there and look what happened with the country after Rose revolution and Saakashvilli ruling.If its too fascinated for u then go to Ukraine and look what happenes to the best friend of Saakashvilli -Uscenko and his people after orange revolution.Both were supported by Bush and his administration.And then go to Russia and compare what happened to this country after 1991.What another country would be able to reanimate the economy so fast and become one of the strongest in the world.Anyway Russia is the strongest country who has oil and smart hesd now and in the near future is not going to serve to Europe.And truth will appear in anytime what happened in Ossetiain 2,5 10 years.But by this time you will find another thing to judge.but Winner can be judged.

By: A

Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:06:16 +0000

Myli?am si? w stwierdzeniu, ?e niewiele znaczy ustalona opinia o Rosji jako agresorze. Dla nie by?o to stwierdzenienie nie wymagajace dowod�w lecz im dalej od granic UE dystans polityczny i terytorialny powodowa? rozbie?no?ci w ocenie. Og�lne uznanie Rosji za agresora mo?e nawet prze?ozy? si? na korzysci jakie uzyska Gruzja (cho? koszt tych paru dni wojny jest materialnie dla Gruzji wr?cz zab�jczy, dla ludno?ci szczeg�lnie jako,?e armia rosjska ma z?? s?aw?). Je?li chodzi o Osety?czyk�w to nie by?abym pewna czy utworzenie odr?bnego pa?stwa Osety?skiego by?oby korzystne. Sami Osety?czycy chc? (chyba) “niepdleg?o?ci od” Gruzin�w ni? niepodleg?o?ci jako takiej. Ma?e narody mog? by? niewydolne w tworzeniu struktur pa?stwa szczeg�lnie w tak zapalnych rejonach jak Kaukaz.

By: markbiernat

markbiernat — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:51:50 +0000

The more I read about what is going on in Georgia I am understanding. The reason Russia attacked Georgia is Georgia wants to connect to NATO and even the EU. Russia does not want this. They also do not want this to happen to Ukraine. Russia wants it like it was in the 1970s a series of satellites that revolve around Moscow and the oligarachs.

By: A

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:52:59 +0000

Tak ale to niewiele znaczy, Gruzini zostan? przydeptani, Rosja zrobi co zechce, Europa poczeka. Gdyby ceny ropy i gazu by?y ni?sze to by?oby lepiej.

By: markbiernat

markbiernat — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:32:49 +0000

At this point it is very clear Russia is the aggressor and the victors are the Ossetians and Georgians. Also it is very clear Putin is in charge.

By: A

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:00:23 +0000

Dlaczego – to proste, Rosja chce uzyska? jak najwi?cej. Jedyn? niwewiadom? jest – jak wiele uzyska – cho? w tej chwili mo?na mie? obawy, ?e naprawd? du?o – nowy(prorosyjski) rz?d w Gruzji. Odr?bn? spraw? jest traktowanie mniejszo?ci narodowych – tutaj chyba nie ma jednoznacznych rozwi?za?. Oby tylko ofiar by?o jak najmniej, oby tylko sko?czy?o si? jak najszybciej.